ASIC crackdown on real estate agents sparked by letter to staff member


Providing unlicensed financial advice carries a maximum penalty of five years’ prison and a $126,000 fine for individuals.

Liberal senator James Paterson, as chairman of the parliamentary joint committee on corporations and financial services, queried the regulator about the number of complaints it had received and the basis for sending the letter.

ASIC responded to the questions on notice late on Thursday, saying a staff member had received a letter from their own property manager about “applying for the early release of superannuation funds to meet rental payments”. There had also been one report of misconduct from a member of the public and ASIC had seen Twitter posts from tenants about this behaviour from late March.

On April 1, Labor assistant treasurer Stephen Jones wrote to ASIC warning about real estate agents potentially providing unqualified financial advice to tenants.

The regulator had since received 70 reports of misconduct from members of the public and was “assessing the information we have received”.

ASIC said real estate agents could provide factual information about the existence of the government’s new super policy.

“However, if that factual information is presented in a manner that may reasonably be regarded as suggesting or implying a recommendation to withdraw superannuation savings, the real estate agent may be providing unlicensed financial product advice,” it said in response to Senator Paterson’s query.

Senator Paterson said tenants should make decisions in their own best interests, considering the range of support policies national cabinet had put in place.

“I’m pleased ASIC has clarified agents or anyone else can inform people about the existence of the federal governments early access super policy without offering financial advice,” he said.

Disputes are on the increase across the sector as tenants in some areas refuse to pay rent and some landlords decline to offer rent reductions, prompting real estate groups to urge state and territory governments to step in more.

Real Estate Institute of NSW president Leanne Pilkington said current advice was for tenants and landlords to “work it out between themselves” and this had “numerous shortfalls”.

“Certainly, there are tenants who are feeling the pinch and for whom rent relief will be necessary should they lose their jobs or have their work scaled back,” Ms Pilkington said in a statement.

“Equally, there are landlords – typically mum-and-dad investors who depend on the rental income to repay loans or fund their living expenses in retirement. The plan of transferring the financial burden being experienced by the tenant to the landlord is utterly unjust.”

Sign up to our Coronavirus Update newsletter

Get our Coronavirus Update newsletter for the day’s crucial developments at a glance, the numbers you need to know and what our readers are saying. Sign up to The Sydney Morning Herald’s newsletter here and The Age’s here.

Most Viewed in Politics



Related posts

Make a comment