“The great news is the interest is huge.”
Mr Bhatti said BHP was evaluating the detailed submissions before progressing to a “clarification stage” with the companies in January and subsequent negotiations in February.
“We are really excited about it,” he said, “and we expect to award in March-April.”
As well as shipping companies, some of Australia’s major gas producers including Woodside, Shell and Pavilion were among the companies to have participated in the tender, according to Mr Bhatti.
BHP, the world’s biggest miner, has welcomed the United Nations International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) new rules taking effect from next week requiring all ships to use fuel containing no more than 0.5 per cent sulphur, down from 3.5 per cent.
The IMO has also set goals to halve carbon dioxide emissions generated by shipping by 2050 compared to 2008 levels.
“Whilst there is no regulation around that in terms of carbon reduction, that’s coming, there’s no doubt about that,” Mr Bhatti said.
“The industry has been a mono-fuel captive audience to diesel for the last 80 years and it’s only now that the IMO has woken up.”
The incoming reforms have prompted major shippers to seek out cleaner alternatives to the heavy fuel oil known as bunker fuel that until now has been the shipping industry’s main source of fuel. Operators across the shipping supply chain including Australia’s three big iron ore miners – BHP, Rio Tinto and Fortescue – are bracing for additional costs triggered by the new standards and have been exploring options to ensure compliance with the new standards.
Macquarie Wealth Management analysts this year estimated the shift to cleaner fuel and moves to fit vessels with new equipment to capture sulphur emissions could add between US$2-3 a tonne for freight travelling from Western Australia to China.
“In coming years, vast research and development investment will take on non-carbon- fuelled propulsion, requiring the construction of new freight infrastructure,” the investment house said.
Describing global warming as an indisputable crisis requiring a global “mobilisation” effort, BHP’s outgoing chief executive, Andrew Mackenzie, embarked this year on a $500 million carbon-reduction drive to cut not only BHP’s own emissions but the emissions generated from beyond its mine gates – known as “scope 3” emissions – caused by shippers and the customers of its products such as Asian steel mills and power plants.
The reporter travelled to Singapore courtesy of BHP.
Business reporter for The Age and Sydney Morning Herald.