Mitchell accused of threatening tennis execs


Under cross examination by counsel for ASIC, Michael Pearce, QC, Mr Healy was asked about a compliant made to him by then Tennis Australia boss Steve Wood in relation to Mr Mitchell acting aggressively in favour of Seven during the rights negotiations in 2012.

Mr Healy said he had spoken with Mr Mitchell after Mr Wood’s complaint and gave a direction for him to step back from the negotiations.

Mr Pearce then asked: “You agree Mr Mitchell is not used to taking direction from other people?”

Mr Healy said he agree with that statement. Mr Pearce asked Mr Healy if he was aware that after that warning Mr Mitchell, according to Mr Wood, had continued making threats about Mr Wood’s employment.

The court heard this included Mr Mitchell telling Mr Wood: “You had better do a deal with Seven”.
Mr Mitchell also allegedly said: “This will cost you your job” and “When will you learn to do your job.”

It was also alleged that the famed ad man also suggested Tennis Australia’s chief operating officer Steve Ayles be sacked for commissioning a report delving into the future values of the rights and that he said: “This is how CFOs get sacked” to Mr Wood during a conversation about the rights.

Former Tennis Australia director Harold Mitchell leaves the Federal Court in November.Credit:AAP

Mr Healy said he was not aware that Mr Mitchell had made such comments and if he had been aware at the time he would have spoken with Mr Mitchell.

The court also heard that Mr Mitchell was dismissive of approaches from IMG and Nine Entertainment during the 2012 negotiations for the rights to broadcast the Australian Open, the tennis body’s former president Steve Healy has told the court.

Loading

Mr Healy also revealed that after he found out Channel 10 had made an offer for the rights, he did not seek any information about how much the network had bid for the five-year rights to broadcast the top tennis tournament.

During cross examination, Mr Pearce asked Mr Healy if he knew Mr Mitchell’s opinions on IMG included that its bid was too conditional and that IMG had been “naughty” and “cannot be trusted”.

“Yes, he said that” Mr Healy said.

Mr Pearce then asked: “Did you ask him why not?”

Mr Healy responded: “They’ll just sell it on for the highest price.”

Mr Healy was also asked about Mr Mitchell’s opinion of Nine, which had made an approach to Tennis Australia to flag its interest in the rights negotiations.

“That was again dismissed by Mr Mitchell wasn’t it?” Mr Pearce said.

Mr Healy responded: “He made the comment they had the cricket.”

Mr Healy said Mr Wood had told him the IMG offer was simply being used as leverage to drive a bigger offer from Seven. He also said he never discounted a separate offer from Network 10, despite that broadcaster’s financial issues.

Loading

However, Mr Healy told the court that despite being informed about Ten’s interest by Mr Wood, he never asked Mr Wood for more details because the offer was made during a six-month period when Tennis Australia was in an exclusive negotiating period with Seven.

“It’s very hard to believe that at the end of this process, you’ve got an offer from IMG and you’ve got an offer from Seven, interest from 10.” Mr Pearce said.

“It’s very hard to believe Mr Healy that you didn’t seek to find out what they would pay,” Mr Pearce added.

Most Viewed in Business

Loading



Business

Related posts

Make a comment